In February 2018, Russia’s Constitutional Court ruled that trademark owners’ claims against parallel importers may themselves be “abusive” if they unjustifiably limit importers into Russia or if the owners’ branded goods are overpriced. The Court also ruled parallel imported goods may only be confiscated and destroyed if they fail to meet required standards of quality, safety, health, environment or culture.
The court effectively ruled that IP rights should not be used to limit competition, even where rules offer the opportunity to seek compensation from the parallel importer, said Elena Sokolovskaya, head of the antitrust practice at Pepeliaev Group. That ruling created confusion for practitioners in the field, she says. “Practitioners are not very clear with all the provisions that are stipulated and we are waiting from FAS for clarifications with regards to implementation of thus Court decision,” she said.
A Partner from Pepeliaev Group Has Been Appointed to the Panel of Arbitrators of the Hainan International Arbitration Court (HIAC) Read more
03.03.2026
Pepeliaev Group Has Announced the Appointment of New Counsel Read more
26.02.2026
Experts from Pepeliaev Group Have Achieved Outstanding Results in the Individual Pravo-300 Ranking for 2025 Read more
By continuing to view this website, you agree with cookie files and other Internet statistics and configuration methods, means and tools being used that are applied on the website to make it more user friendly as well as, in certain cases, to promote the work and services of Pepeliaev Group and to provide information about upcoming events.