Projects

Prevented the risks of the client’s transaction being invalidated and the risk of assets being lost

The lawyers from Pepeliaev Group’s bankruptcy practice have prepared an opinion for the subsidiary of a major national oil and gas corporation with an assessment of the risks relating to the set off of the counter claims of the potentially bankrupt company. The legal analysis of the situation, as well as of legislation and case law, has revealed significant risks that the assets will be lost even if the debt of the insolvent contractor is settled by way of set off. Based on the recommendations prepared by our specialists the client took a business decision that ruled out financial losses. 

Provided comprehensive defence of the interests of a group of companies: assets worth RUB 2 billion have been preserved

As part of a bankruptcy case, Pepeliaev Group's lawyers represented major telecommunications company Sitronics as a creditor, a former shareholder and a counterparty of the debtor, as well as acted for other companies within the group. Our lawyers successfully defended the client in nine proceedings in which transactions were contested. This made it possible to retain the group's assets worth RUB 2 billion. Moreover, our specialists managed to have a claim denied for secondary liability to be imposed on the client and on the debtor's director. The project is interesting because it involves multiple aspects and it forms case law relating to the regulations on secondary liability being applied over time. 

Advisory services to a client in the context of the antitrust legislation of Russia and of the Eurasian Economic Union

Pepeliaev Group’s lawyers advised an international manufacturer of automotive vehicles on an export model for the distribution of goods in the context of the antitrust legislation of Russia and the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU).

Supporting an airline in challenging the results of a tender

Pepeliaev Group’s experts represented a Russian airline when it challenged the results of a tender and an agreement the vendor was forced to enter into with the airline. Despite there being no existing case law in this area, Pepeliaev Group’s lawyers managed to have the claim denied by the court of first instance and court of appeal, thus creating a legal precedent.

Representing a client accused of having entered into a cartel agreement: the court has ruled in our favour

The Practice’s lawyers represented a large transport operator who, together with ten other companies, was accused of having entered into a cartel agreement and an anticompetitive agreement with a state authority. 

Successfully contesting the ruling of a fine for false advertising Pepeliaev Group’s lawyers successfully represented an FMCG company before the FAS when the resolution was contested of the Stavropol Office of the FAS that the company be fined for violating the Law on Advertising, in particular, for false advertising. The FAS made claims concerning an allegedly inaccurate piece of advertising. Thanks to the efforts of our lawyers the case was terminated and the FAS’s resolution set aside.