One of the biggest international pharmaceutical companies instructed Pepeliaev Group to arrange for a procedure to check the reputation of healthcare professionals from the perspective of legislation on personal data should the company decide to do business with them.

The  lawyers drafted a legal memo concerning all potential administrative fines in connection with personal data being processed in non-compliance with Russian legislation and the maximum total amount of such potential fines.

The team from our practice group conducted a comprehensive analysis of the processes concerning how personal data was processed within the group of companies of a large developer.

A team from our tax practice provided legal support to a client that sought to challenge a tax audit report.

Pepeliaev Group's team supported the client in relation to how the functions of the general contractor should have been transferred within the scope of a project under which infrastructure was built at a gas deposit located on the Russian continental shelf. 

The team of Pepeliaev Group’s Environmental Practice provided full-fledged legal support to the Chinese party to a Russian-Chinese joint venture which had been set up to develop, construct and operate a coalmine in Zabaykalye.

The lawyers of the practice provided legal support to a large international pharmaceutical company under a project to implement and subsequently adjust bonus programmes under which medicines are supplied within the scope of the procurement segment and those that are used in the commercial segment (pharmacy chains).

The practice was providing support to a high-tech IT company in several court disputes with a confrontational employee over attempts to challenge more than ten disciplinary sanctions and the salary. 

Our practice represented in court a major producer of confectionery products in a complicated lawsuit with an employee.

Pepeliaev Group's Employment and Migration Law Practice represented an independent Russian investment group in a litigation with an employee who had been dismissed for absence without leave.

Our practice represented a major Russian retailer before the International Commercial Arbitration Court at the Russian Chamber of Commerce and Industry in a dispute with a contractor that had filed a claim to recover from the client the cost of the manufactured equipment, the cost of the storage of it and other expenses connected with it being impossible to supply the equipment.

Our team represented a private clinic in courts of all levels in a lawsuit filed by the prosecutor’s office seeking to have a concession agreement declared void for the construction of a medical institution.

The practice conducted a mock audit by the Russian Federal Antimonopoly Service at the request of one of the world’s largest pharmaceutical companies.

The lawyers of our practice conducted an audit of the operations of a major Russian producer of fertilisers to identify possible antimonopoly risks.

Lawyers of the Antimonopoly Practice represented a client against whom the Antimonopoly Service had initiated a case in connection with the sale of products labelled as ‘halal’. The antimonopoly authority believed that these actions constituted bad-faith competition because they were misleading consumers.

The Real Estate Practice in St Petersburg provided support to the client in the process of entering into an investment agreement (an agreement for the sale and purchase of a future item) with the developer, including providing recommendations to amend a number of material terms and conditions of the agreement.